By
Sasha Pierre-Louis
AAAED
We are indeed becoming a diverse nation in that the United States is estimated to have a
minority-majority population by 2044 according to census
data. With the rise of the minority
population, it is critical to sustain dialogs of cultural awareness and understanding as part of
organizational climate. During a time where race relations are becoming strained in the aftermath of a
divisive election cycle, there is great danger in becoming complacent with a work environment that does not fully guard and is inclusive of all protected groups.
At the end of 2015, at least three institutions publicly announced that they will spend millions of dollars on initiatives to increase faculty diversity. Institutions must stay committed to not only recruitment but faculty retention efforts. High turnover and attrition rates 1among minority faculty do not reflect progression of increased diversity in faculty appointments but rather that universities “don’t want them.” The question then becomes is academia a welcoming place for all?
It is only in the last fifteen to twenty years that universities have started to collect data and produce diversity specific strategic goals to upturn minority faculty recruitment. Because of the national media’s pressure to recruit more minority faculty, a 2008 study by theAmerican Council on Education reported that while student diversity is on the rise, the rate at which faculty of color are hired is not.
It is critical that universities
understand that in order to fully embody diversity there must be institutional
change so that there is an inclusive
learning environment and not simply the meeting of student demands. This,
in turn, will create a world class institution. Diversity and inclusion efforts do not solely rely on recruitment but must include faculty retention.
In instances where faculty of color are not earning tenure track
positions or their scholarship is not valued, many faculty of color do not
feel connected or supported by their
institution which consequently leads to being systemically pushed out or leaving for other career opportunities. A hostile
work environment does not promote organizational outcomes; in this case, it is faculty and student success.
Although there is a growing pipeline of doctorates of color, they are not being hired into faculty
positions that are visible and supportive of students. This is important to note because the lack of support and
visibility for people of color is not unique to higher education. Racial minorities only hold 4.8 percent of leadership positions in Fortune 500 companies in comparison to their white colleagues. It is
imperative that students, advocates
and faculty stay vigilant in voicing their concerns for a representative
faculty that reflects the
populations it serves. Increased
success with faculty recruitment must start by communicating with current faculty on the climate of their
department and institution without
fear of retaliation.
Understanding the reasons for faculty of color attrition and poor
retention potentially engenders organizational and cultural shifts that support retaining
faculty of color. The insight from current faculty can focus
the diversity recruitment and
retention efforts led by university officials. Delineating a strategic plan must happen to maintain the
development of institutional
diversity. It not only allows for accountability and transparency
in retaining faculty of color and
increasing campus diversity but also sets a precedent for an inclusive workplace environment.
Change in faculty diversity will not happen overnight but there are some steps in which departments
and institutions can take to be successful in minority faculty recruitment and retention.
Be intentional in recruitment.
When seeking out diverse candidates, outreach is one key aspect to consider. A strategic
plan that explicitly states the intended recruitment
goals and outcomes will keep accountability
for university leadership as well as enact a plan of action for the years to come. With the strategic
plan in place, it is critical that the search
for faculty begin well before the need for new faculty.
For example, recruiting
should begin with outreach at the undergraduate and graduate level. As
supported by university recruitment research, this creates
a pool of talent that may be interested in faculty positions
in the future. Not only should universities reach out to undergraduate and graduate students
but also consider
collaborating with minority
serving institutions as a way to gain more exposure to students with different college experiences.
Highlight the Benefits.
During the hiring process,
the search committee
must be aware of the implicit biases they
may have toward people of color versus other candidates. Search committee individuals may unintentionally highlight the cons of the work environment rather than underscore the pros. The pros of the job are typically what would influence all candidates to not only work but live in the local university community.
An example
of highlighting the cons would be the lack of minority population and activities in the local community rather than the opportunity for further professional development and a great school system for families. While both may be equally important to the candidate, it should be explicitly up to the candidate on the deciding
factor of accepting
a faculty position.
Mentor new faculty.
The benefit of pairing new faculty with older faculty can create an organizational culture
of support for development. It would provide faculty with opportunities to build a working relationship with other
faculty as well as gain access to professional
resources and understand the underlining culture of the department.
One reason faculty of color are not as successful as their white
counterparts is lack of access to
resources and capital. Clewell and Anderson emphasize in their research that minorities, specifically African Americans, were extremely limited to college access for decades thus resulting
in navigational barriers to higher education
and eventually professorship. To counter the access gap, the resources
and knowledge that current faculty
can share with new faculty of color could be the difference between being
successful as a faculty member or not. Having a mentor to guide one through a
new university setting can be very
beneficial to a new faculty member. They
can serve as an ally or a sponsor during difficult
workplace situations.
Find meaning and value in their work.
Faculty of color and minorities add invaluable experiences, insights and scholarship to an
institution and department. Although
not all, it is likely that faculty
of color are conducting and presenting research that revolves around their marginalized identity. At the start of the
new millennium, Daufin’s study found that some of the main causes
for low job satisfaction among faculty of color was because of undertones of
discrimination and lack of support or understanding
within their department. Departments must support their work in the same way as they would other faculty members by
providing constructive feedback,
opportunities for research grants and collaborating with other scholars in the
field.
On average faculty of color spend more time developing students than their white counterpart by
mentoring and advising students in ways that others do not. A diverse
faculty workforce brings unique insights into the class room and are sometimes
able to better relate to students
and their needs. Minority faculty must be recognized and supported for their efforts in going beyond faculty expectations because this part of
their job often goes unrewarded.
Diversity must be valued by everyone within an institution and viewed as an asset that increases the value
of the university. Though the United States is becoming more diverse and have made legislative progress in equity, it is apparent that companies and institutions of higher education are in a
deficit of a diverse workforce that accurately
represent the people in which it serves. Increased diversity cannot successfully
happen in a year; it takes time, effort and strategy.
For full list
of references or further comments or questions please contact Sasha at spierrel@gmu.edu.
No comments:
Post a Comment