The Chronicle of Higher Education
September 19, 2010
By Audrey Williams June
Caroline Sotello Turner's career as a professor spans 23 years at three institutions. At all the job interviews she's had over the years, she wanted assurance that her future colleagues were truly interested in diversity. Sometimes she has had to uncover signs of that commitment on her own.
"I would get asked a lot of questions about why I'm interested in coming, but I'm evaluating their campus, too," says Ms. Turner, a Latina newly hired as a professor in the doctoral program in...
Full Story: http://chronicle.com/article/What-Search-Committees-See/124439/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en (Subscription Required)
Showing posts with label search committee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label search committee. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Tuesday, August 5, 2008
Keys to Hiring Women in Science
Inside Higher Ed
August 5, 2008
Campuses are full of both success stories and horror stories about the recruitment of women to positions in science and engineering departments. There are search committee chairs convinced that they know what worked — and would-be professors who never bothered applying for positions because they didn’t feel welcome.
Two sociologists who want to push the discussion beyond anecdotes and individual preferences think they have found evidence of steps that do make a difference in the recruitment of women for science faculty jobs. Specifically, they urge a focus on efforts to increase the pool of female applicants, and the importance of having a woman serve on the search committee.
The sociologists — Christy M. Glass of Utah State University and Krista Lynn Minnotte of the University of North Dakota, who presented findings this weekend in Boston at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association — based their analysis on confidential reviews of all of the science, mathematics and engineering searches at a Western doctoral-granting university over a five-year period. They were able to track what happened to 3,245 applicants for 63 positions — and included all applicants except those whose gender was not clear from name or biographical information.
In some respects, their analysis found a clear willingness to hire women. The university offered jobs to 5.6 percent of female applicants, compared to only 2.9 percent of male applicants. But because 84.8 percent of all applicants were male, and because female applicants who were offered jobs were more likely to turn them down, the authors write that it is key to identify the factors that work for women.
Searches that included advertisements or postings in publications focused on women in science attracted far more female applicants than did comparable searches that did not engage in such recruitment strategies. Men appear to have an “information advantage” in finding out about openings, said Minnotte, so steps that balance that have an impact on attracting female candidates.
Attracting female candidates is important because search committees were much more likely to move women to the finalist stage when there were many women in the pool than when there were just a few.
Another strategy discussed was having at least one woman on a search committee. [To read the entire story, go to: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/08/05/women ]
August 5, 2008
Campuses are full of both success stories and horror stories about the recruitment of women to positions in science and engineering departments. There are search committee chairs convinced that they know what worked — and would-be professors who never bothered applying for positions because they didn’t feel welcome.
Two sociologists who want to push the discussion beyond anecdotes and individual preferences think they have found evidence of steps that do make a difference in the recruitment of women for science faculty jobs. Specifically, they urge a focus on efforts to increase the pool of female applicants, and the importance of having a woman serve on the search committee.
The sociologists — Christy M. Glass of Utah State University and Krista Lynn Minnotte of the University of North Dakota, who presented findings this weekend in Boston at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association — based their analysis on confidential reviews of all of the science, mathematics and engineering searches at a Western doctoral-granting university over a five-year period. They were able to track what happened to 3,245 applicants for 63 positions — and included all applicants except those whose gender was not clear from name or biographical information.
In some respects, their analysis found a clear willingness to hire women. The university offered jobs to 5.6 percent of female applicants, compared to only 2.9 percent of male applicants. But because 84.8 percent of all applicants were male, and because female applicants who were offered jobs were more likely to turn them down, the authors write that it is key to identify the factors that work for women.
Searches that included advertisements or postings in publications focused on women in science attracted far more female applicants than did comparable searches that did not engage in such recruitment strategies. Men appear to have an “information advantage” in finding out about openings, said Minnotte, so steps that balance that have an impact on attracting female candidates.
Attracting female candidates is important because search committees were much more likely to move women to the finalist stage when there were many women in the pool than when there were just a few.
Another strategy discussed was having at least one woman on a search committee. [To read the entire story, go to: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/08/05/women ]
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)