Obama's True Colors: Black, White ... or Neither?

Diverse Issues in Higher Education
by Associated Press
Dec 15, 2008, 03:48

A perplexing new chapter is unfolding in Barack Obama's racial saga: Many people insist that "the first Black president" is actually not Black.
Debate over whether to call this son of a White Kansan and a Black Kenyan biracial, African-American, mixed-race, half-and-half, multiracial — or, in Obama's own words, a “mutt” — has reached a crescendo since Obama's election shattered assumptions about race.
Obama has said, “I identify as African-American — that’s how I’m treated and that’s how I’m viewed. I’m proud of it.” In other words, the world gave Obama no choice but to be Black, and he was happy to oblige.
But the world has changed since the young Obama found his place in it.
Intermarriage and the decline of racism are dissolving ancient definitions. The candidate Obama, in achieving what many thought impossible, was treated differently from previous Black generations. And many White and mixed-race people now view President-elect Obama as something other than Black.
So what now for racial categories born of a time when those from far-off lands were property rather than people, or enemy instead of family?
"They're falling apart," said Dr. Marty Favor, a Dartmouth professor of African and African-American studies and author of the book Authentic Blackness.
"In 1903, W.E.B. DuBois said the question of the 20th century is the question of the color line, which is a simplistic Black-White thing," said Favor, who is biracial. "This is the moment in the 21st century when we're stepping across that."

Full Story: http://diverseeducation.com/artman/publish/article_12075.shtml

He's Not Black

The Washington Post
By Marie Arana
Sunday, November 30, 2008; B01

He is also half white.
Unless the one-drop rule still applies, our president-elect is not black.
We call him that -- he calls himself that -- because we use dated language and logic. After more than 300 years and much difficult history, we hew to the old racist rule: Part-black is all black. Fifty percent equals a hundred. There's no in-between.
That was my reaction when I read these words on the front page of this newspaper the day after the election: "Obama Makes History: U.S. Decisively Elects First Black President."
The phrase was repeated in much the same form by one media organization after another. It's as if we have one foot in the future and another still mired in the Old South. We are racially sophisticated enough to elect a non-white president, and we are so racially backward that we insist on calling him black. Progress has outpaced vocabulary.
To me, as to increasing numbers of mixed-race people, Barack Obama is not our first black president. He is our first biracial, bicultural president. He is more than the personification of African American achievement. He is a bridge between races, a living symbol of tolerance, a signal that strict racial categories must go.
Of course there is much to celebrate in seeing Obama's victory as a victory for African Americans. The long, arduous battles that were fought and won in the name of civil rights redeemed our Constitution and brought a new sense of possibility to all minorities in this country. We Hispanic Americans, very likely the most mixed-race people in the world, credit our gains to the great African American pioneers of yesterday: Rosa Parks, W.E.B. Du Bois, Martin Luther King Jr.
But Obama's ascent to the presidency is more than a triumph for blacks. It is the signal of a broad change with broad ramifications. The world has become too fused, too interdependent to ignore this emerging reality: Just as banks, earthly resources and human disease form an intricate global web, so do racial ties. No one appreciates this more, perhaps, than the American Hispanic.

Full story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/28/AR2008112802219_pf.html